Demonstrate our commitment to measurable improvement of IDE outcomes (retention, recruitment, achievement, thriving/belonging, and cultural competence) through data collection and analysis and transparent communication.


Objectives:  5.1 / 5.2 / 5.3

Objective 5.1 Establish key performance metrics in the areas of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Strategy 5.1.1

Establish a baseline and measure and communicate progress on outcomes for student recruitment, retention, achievement, thriving and belonging, cultural competence, and program effectiveness.

  • (Proposed) Responsible Party: Tuesday Group, Admissions, Provost, and Dean of Students
MetricCompletion Date
Student Recruitment: Yearly applicant total of URM* and first generation at parity with URM in national high school population; URM applications and yield at median or above compared to peer groupAnnual improvement with parity in five years
Student Retention: Cohort year-to-year retention of URM and first-generation students at parity with overall retentionAnnual improvement with parity in five years
Student Thriving and Belonging: Using three to five questions from COFHE survey, establish a baseline measure of thriving and belonging, tracking over time demonstrated improvement from the baseline and a decrease in differential experience between URM/NURM and first-generation studentsAnnual improvement with parity in five years
Student Achievement: For URM/NURM, first-generation, low-income, and other cohorts including Posse, Questbridge, TRIO; parity with overall student population in four- and six-year graduation rates and participation in high-impact experiences including off-campus studies and researchAnnual improvement with parity in five years
Student Cultural Competence: Establish a baseline to measure change over time in cultural competence with an assessment tool (example: Intercultural Development Inventory [IDI]) and demonstrated improvement year over year. Track the opportunities for engagement in IDE related activities and number of participantsTBD

*Underrepresented minorities (URM) is used because it is broadly defined and allows for comparisons to external benchmarking. URM can be expanded as needed to meet specific Carleton goals.

Strategy 5.1.2

Establish a baseline and measure and communicate progress on outcomes for faculty recruitment, retention, achievement, thriving and belonging, cultural competence, and program effectiveness.

  • (Proposed) Responsible Party: Tuesday Group, Provost, Human Resources
MetricCompletion Date
Faculty Recruitment: Establish a baseline measure of the percentage of existing URM applicants and representation on the faculty. Increase in representation to be at the median of peer group for each URM categoryAnnual improvement with parity at five to seven years
Faculty Retention: Measure URM/NURM retention at one, four, seven, eight years with goal of parity between URM and NURMAnnual improvement with parity at eight to ten years
Faculty Thriving and Belonging: Using three to five questions from HERI survey, establish a baseline measure of thriving and belonging, tracking over time for demonstrated improvement from the baseline and a decrease in differential experience between URM/NURMAnnual improvement with parity at three to six years
Faculty Achievement: For URM/NURM faculty, establish a baseline and measure tenure rates, election/appointment to governance/college committees, endowed professorships internal faculty grant awardsAnnual improvement with parity at five to seven years
Faculty Cultural Competence: Establish a baseline to measure change over time in cultural competence with an assessment tool (example IDI) and demonstrated improvement year over year. Track
the opportunities for engagement in IDE related activities and number of participants
TBD

Strategy 5.1.3

Establish a baseline and measure and communicate progress on outcomes for staff recruitment, retention, achievement, thriving and belonging, cultural competence, and program effectiveness.

  • (Proposed) Responsible Party: Tuesday Group, Human Resources
MetricCompletion Date
Staff Recruitment: Establish a baseline measure of the percentage of existing URM applicants and representation for each staff category. Increase in representation for each staff category to be at the median of peer group for each URM category. Annual improvement with parity at three to five years
Staff Retention: Measure URM/NURM retention at one year for all staff, three to five years for nonexempt, union, and long- term exempt staff positions with goal of parity between URM and NURMAnnual improvement with parity at three to five years
Staff Thriving and Belonging: Using three to five questions from the Staff Experience survey, establish a baseline measure of thriving and belonging, tracking over
time demonstrated improvement from the baseline and a decrease in differential experience between URM/NURM
Annual improvement with parity in three years
Staff Achievement: For URM/NURM staff establish a baseline and measure promotion rates/grade level representation, grouped representation on Leadership Advisory Board and participation in governance/college committees with the goal of achieving parityAnnual improvement with parity at four to six years
Staff Cultural Competence: Establish a baseline to measure change over time in cultural competence with an assessment tool (example IDI) and demonstrate improvement year over year. Track
the opportunities for engagement in IDE-related activities and number of participants
TBD

Objective 5.2 Implement a system designed to support coordination and tracking of data and inform decision making and allocation of resources committed to IDE efforts

Strategy 5.2.1

Assign clear roles to achieve the outcomes of recruitment, retention, achievement, thriving and belonging, and identify oversight group(s) who will:

  1. Be accountable for the outcome
  2. Be responsible for the work to achieve these outcomes
  3. Be consulted on the tactics to achieve the outcome
  4. Be informed about progress
  • (Proposed) Responsible Party: Tuesday Group, Chief Diversity Officer
  • Completion Date: TBD dependent on Chief Diversity Officer hiring

Proposed Role Structure for Responsibility, Accountability, Consulting, and Informing

IDE OutcomesPopulation FocusResponsible Unit(s)Accountable for OversightStakeholders for Consulting and Informing
RecruitmentStudentsAdmissionsBoard–Enrollment and Admissions CommitteeAFAC, CSA, Alumni Leadership Groups
RecruitmentFacultyProvost, Chief Diversity Officer FCPC or Board–HR CommitteeAlumni Leadership Groups
RecruitmentStaffHuman Resources, Chief Diversity OfficerTuesday Group, Board–HR CommitteeLAB, Alumni Leadership Groups
RetentionStudentsDean of Students, Provost, Chief Diversity Officer Tuesday Group, Board–Student Life CommitteeCSA, ACSL, Admissions, Alumni Leadership Groups
RetentionFacultyProvost, Human Resources, Chief Diversity OfficerTuesday Group, Faculty Affairs CommitteeAlumni Leadership Groups
RetentionStaffHuman Resources, Chief Diversity OfficerTuesday Group, Board–HR CommitteeLAB, Alumni Leadership Groups
Thriving and BelongingStudentsDean of Students, Provost, Chief Diversity Officer Tuesday GroupCSA, Alumni Leadership Groups
Thriving and BelongingFacultyProvost, Human Resources, Chief Diversity OfficerTuesday Group, Faculty Affairs CommitteeAlumni Leadership Groups
Thriving and BelongingStaffHuman Resources, Chief Diversity OfficerTuesday GroupForum, SAC, LAB, Alumni Leadership Groups
AchievementStudentsProvost, Dean of StudentsTuesday GroupCSA, Alumni Leadership Groups
AchievementFacultyProvostTuesday GroupAlumni Leadership Groups
AchievementStaffHuman ResourcesTuesday GroupLAB, Alumni Leadership Groups
Cultural CompetenceStudentsDean of Students, Provost, Chief Diversity Officer Tuesday GroupCSA, Alumni Leadership Groups
Cultural CompetenceFacultyProvost, Human Resources, Chief Diversity OfficerTuesday Group, Faculty Affairs CommitteeAlumni Leadership Groups
Cultural CompetenceStaffHuman Resources, Chief Diversity OfficerTuesday GroupLAB, SAC, Forum, Alumni Leadership Groups

Strategy 5.2.2

Establish a baseline and measure and communicate progress on outcomes for faculty recruitment, retention, achievement, thriving and belonging, cultural competence, and program effectiveness.

  • (Proposed) Responsible Party: Tuesday Group, Provost, Human Resources

Strategy 5.2.3

Establish a baseline and measure and communicate progress on outcomes for staff recruitment, retention, achievement, thriving and belonging, cultural competence, and program effectiveness.

  • (Proposed) Responsible Party: Tuesday Group, Provost, Human Resources

Objective 5.3 Commit to ongoing, timely dissemination of relevant data and outcomes to the broader community

Strategy 5.3.1

Ensure the ongoing and timely communication, including the development of a dashboard, of progress toward IDE outcomes to the Carleton community.

  • (Proposed) Responsible Party: Chief Diversity Officer
  • Process: Through partnership between Institutional Research and Assessment, the Chief Diversity Officer, Tuesday Group, and the Communications Office use existing communications channels to share IDE updates frequently, i.e., Carleton College Voice (annually), Carleton Today (regularly), and as part of the President’s Quarterly Meeting (annually), Alumni and Parent & Family newsletters (annually), IDE website (quarterly) with links sent to the entire community.

The Work of the Steering Group  |  IDE Steering Group  |  Working Groups  |  FAQs  |  Related Efforts